Posts filed under 'Internet 2.0/Web 2.0'
Children are the masters of Internet
It’s their environment, their world, their natural environment. For them a mailing address or a fixed phone does not mean too much, a mobile phone number is somewhat more useful for the simple reason that can send and receive messages, but when they want to be in contact when they know other children and make new friends Do not ask any of these data, you say: give me your messenger. Do not ask if you have a computer, whether they are connected to the Internet or if you have a hotmail account, assume that all these requirements are met and that, furthermore, the connection is ADSL. Children are being broadband.
So do not be fooled, the Internet is not ours. We just are preparing for what they do on the Internet so that we can hardly imagine. We can talk about technological innovation, business development, communication and interaction, social networking and Web 2.0, the Web 3.0 and any neologism that we were going to occur. Prehistory. The wonderfully modern Internet that lets you do so many things and through crowded highways whose byte has come to this blog is little more than a Beta carried out with a lot of work and best intentions.
Being a child is no longer what it was. Being a child is the closest thing to be a pilot in Formula 1, because childhood is a time that runs at speeds of vertigo. That’s why the children are better prepared to assume, understand, develop and improve anything they find around them.
The estdaísticas say (and are estadísiticas 2007 U.S., so the figures should be revised upwards) that young people who now have less than 22 years have passed:
– More than 20,000 hours in front of the TV
– More than 5000 hours playing video game
– More than 5000 hours on the phone
– Have sent and received over 250,000 SMS messages and emails
– And more than half have created some content for the Internet
They also say the data from various sources and studies that a child of 13 to 15 years have, on average, more than 350 contacts added in his messenger, that in an open session is from 5 to 15 simultaneous conversations, and that makes it more Ergonomic a command that kind PlayStation a flyer for “driving” a car in their video games. I really loved broadband are drawing a future that is in advance of ours.
The key to understanding what is the role and importance of children in the development of technology is to assume that pobablemente for the first time in history, children ahead of their parents’ access to and use of technologies. The computer was cheaper enough for a computer is not a subject that we must maintain expensive section of the reach of minors. On the other hand, applications, content and utilities designed for children, or that children can use “to his measure” are very numerous and easily accessible via the Web. It’s over technology and devices “reserved for elders.” Mobile phones, PDAs, computers, the video game consoles, MP3 and MP4 are part of the natural environment of most of our children and that is why they, in many cases, the early adopters, the energizing and introducing technology in homes, families and schools. We can not ignore that.
Driven by curiosity and excitement.
Two powerful engines to which must be added the lack of “technological panic” so typical of our generation (those who are among the many thirty-and forty-odd …), which has made us see the technology as many times a threat rather than an ally.
But when we talk about children and the Internet, there is an immediate concern: security. A Google search on the Internet and our children will result in thousands of pages where pornography, harassment, cyberbullying and the hazardous contents are the subject of great debate. True, the Internet is full of content that are dangerous or at least undesirable for children. Exactly the same thing happens in the real world.
Parents, educators, associations and authorities are concerned and propose measures, filters, security protocols to protect girls and boys of that which can harm them. It’s a justified concern, and certainly a serious problem. But let us not lose sight of something essential …
The problem of children on the Internet is not the security is the responsibility. And the responsibility is ours forever. The best preventive measure and the best security filter to protect children from the “danger of the Internet” are some parents at her side.
We also learn that we proactively share with our children as the digital life. We must ensure them, but, above all, we must sail with them. Ban is the worst of the alternatives, but has the perverse attraction of which is the simplest. Do not forget it.
And from here, we raised the challenge of incorporating children, the young, adolescent development of the Internet. Not only as observers or as users of the tools and content. They are essential in the design, in the developments in the test and in innovation. Any project-oriented endure and bring value should have at its core the illusion of development, creativity, ability and expectations of the smallest How can we do? Not looking at children only as an attractive market segment, but as an indispensable partner. The education system, economic system, the technological environment … the youngest are in the key point of intersection.
Let us be creative, think of new ways to harness the talents child because their value is incalculable. In this way, your Internet will also be ours and the technological gap that opens will be a bridge between generations and not a border.
Finally, it is helpful to remember that we keep a child inside, or should, thanks to which we remain ayendo the sonar casacabel Santa Claus … Do not you remember? In this case, perhaps it should go back to view with their children or their nephews, Polar Express.
2 comments December 7, 2008
Marketing and Comunication at the 2.0 Entrepise
In the Internet 2.0, the Web 2.0, this Web with so many social networks, thematic communities, participatory forums and hundreds of thousands of millions of blogs, banner (in any form) … do you have something to contribute further to appropriate a valuable space on our screens?
Is the banner friend or enemy? Continue on this road would be poured over wet ink. The time of the banner format as king of online advertising rose. We speak of the banner as a concept.
In our previous post here in Wonderbusiness, said that Marks should have a dialogue with the consumer. It is not enough to be displayed and taught, we must find a way to get to face to face. That is not easy. And one of the reasons why it is not easy because they have no marks or custom method of dialogue with the consumer.
From the press rooms to the bloggers rooms.
One company spoke with the consumer through their products and services.This is how it has always spoken. And also through each and every member of his team.
Marketing, Communication, Advertising tools are the services of the Company, in the service of the brand. Those are their tools, but their arguments are others: quality, innovation and commitment.
It is time to understand the dynamics of the market and the communication is different. That means that the Media (the traditional Mass Media) are not the only disseminators of information or the most qualified opinion makers.
The companies, however, still have their press room, still calling press conferences and carrying out actions of PR with the fundamental objective of attracting the attention of the media. Packaged messages for them and hope that, through them, come to the public and cause a favorable effect.
But at this point, everyone assumed the relevance, importance and impact of blogs and, therefore, of bloggers. And this reality has not yet been integrated by companies on their strategies and actions for Communication & PR. We have not yet seen (and, if any, we have no news of this) bloggers rooms in the corporate websites of large companies (small or not), why are not calling for bloggers to the press or acts of PR? We know that the voices and opinions of bloggers is important, so we are not doing or demagoguery, populism or even sinning opportunism. This is assuming the current reality and act consistently with it.
We know that technology, digital society has an enormous impact on the way we live today. However, the technology is not what matters. What matters is are the changes that technology leads to opening doors, removing distances, matching opportunities and making audible voices.

We’d love to start seeing a paragraph in any website that says’ room bloggers. We’d love to find a campaign banner (drawing that have not yet entirely dead) of any recognized brand with the message “We have opened our bloggers room, please Visit us.” That would begin to demonstrate that the dialogue of Marks with the consumer would be taking a new momentum.
The difference between advertising and participation.
It’s a huge difference. And it’s not a difference of magnitude, is a conceptual difference.
Companies, Marks, Advertisers, I find it interesting to open its doors to the Web 2.0? Do they believe that their relationship with the company and the market would improve if put in place strategies aimed at Social Media to Mass Media?
The Internet 2.0 we live is participatory and based on the free view and share the view as knowledge. And while the generation of view, and content, such as sharing it with millions of people are produced at high speed. Somebody and somebody listener believes. For many, many listeners and many operate on the basis of trust for the views of the content to which they have access. Let’s say it’s the digital version of mouth-ear. That we have come to be called Buzz Marketing, which is that we like so much, especially the marketinianos, put labels …
Buzz Marketing is fine, like the Sustainable Marketing, the Marketing social or otherwise. But the essence is not in the Marketing, Advertising or dissemination we do, but what they really do to generate a stream of opinion and our customers have reason to believe in us as a company, product or brand.
Returning to the classics, for that they are, we could say that the companies never have had the opportunity to integrate their clients in the Value Chain that once defined by Michael Porter.
Participation generates real value and, moreover, is a fantastic axle to turn it on strategies for Marketing and Communication and Advertising campaigns. Web 2.0, Social Media Marketing does not kill, are not a threat to advertising, quite the contrary, encourage and empower new approaches that can achieve better results with the indispensable ally who is always creativity. Clearly, this whole new environment not only requires new strategies, also requires new forms of organization and work within companies. Una dinámica diferente. A different dynamic.
We launched an invitation from Wonderbusiness.
- We invite companies to think about how to start your bloggers room . We invite companies to think of a figure in his team or he who is the Head of Relationship Bloggers (like being taken over the figures of Head of Media Relations and Head of Investor Relations).
- We invite all readers of this blog, whom we thank for their interest and for the kindness to continue our work, to bring us their opinion about this topic.
After all, we are what we share, dont’t you think?
Add comment November 12, 2008
Crisis, business and debt.
We live in an era of the intangible. While the crisis we are now experiencing also stems from something intangible. It is curious how things have changed. When we think about what happened (and happens) in the U.S. with the sadly famous junk mortgages (subprime), we concluded that the giant bubble that has been forming in the last years and that has caused the current situation is one of its epicenters in the value of the financial system has given a absolutely something intangible: the debt. 
We have moved the value of what is the value of what they do not have. In fact, a mortgage is nothing more than someone’s debt, a debt taken on to acquire a building. A debt means that someone has to return money that has given him another one, for that refund have more time, even long time, provided that what we end up giving back is much more of what he was given. So, who is mortgaged, or the debtor becomes a long-term customer who lent him the money.
We could say, in a way that is not the debt where the value lies, but on the client. But in this case that would be a vast understatement because this customer (who are the vast majority of whom most of us because the less I live with a mortgage) is subjected to a forced loyalty plan that, if he could have, would not have chosen. The link between customer financing provider is on the one hand and the need for a further lack of alternative, so that even if does not sound good, the true value is given to the debt, not the client.
The debt runs the financial system and business structure in an extremely unstable, and instability there comes a moment ago that the structure shaken up the critical point of overcoming resistance and do it all collapse. Too much tension causes a crack. Pure physics. Pure logic. Common sense … you know, the less common sense.
But, much as this crisis arises from something as intangible as debt, its consequences that it is tangible. Businesses that fall, closing businesses, people who lose their jobs, wealth that is lost. All this and much more are the results we see and touch every day. In addition, the Stock Exchanges around the world have become schizophrenic and falls, slight recoveries, desplones new and uncertain future are our daily bread Have you lost dignity in the way we do business?, A big business we are talking Is everything has become so speculative that ambition goes above everything else? Have we lost the sense of ethics in the way we do business? We want to be confident that no, but reality shows that something of all this has been forgotten.
Business crisis, money. Everyone more virtual than the previous Could it be that the economy and the financial sitemas not bear much virtuality? Virtuality so much and so many cases not met: loans made to generate debt backed by properties that were supposed to, they would never lose value so if the dedudor could not pay, the creditor is a building that was worth more money than when it was purchased and the lender always wins … and it is not. It turns out that have been built to houses so many people there are not enough to live because, after all, nor do we buy a new house every year and there is no need or money to cope with a cost so high. Therefore there comes a time when the constructor has no more money to continue building, the bank has no money to continue to provide and the debtor has no money to continue paying, and it’s Crack. The system assigns. Too much stress. Too many of course not met.
Any virtual excessively in the negative sense of the word. Virtual because this whole operation of the system has been based on assumptions that no one in front with two fingers had been believed. And that is what we have believed all of us. Or all we have assumed and we have participated. Or the majority of banks, financial institutions and insurers throughout the groups have muyndo fact, which is the same.
Ah, then Will something or someone to the crisis? Of course. Sure. Many survive, should have learned, have been fast, smart and cautious. Many will be, we will have learned. And we will proceed.
- The success of companies after a time of crisis, or are companies that come from the previous period and have either supported the change and adapt to the new ecosystem, or are start-ups but whose talent comes from the accumulated experience and observed in enterprises of the previous era.
- The companies that lead after a time of change are those that have learned from the crisis, not the old schemes that denies knowing that only lead to failure.
- Companies that are strengthened after the chaos are the ones that follow the market and understand that people do not change the overnight dramatically. There is no social or economic transformation that is so explosive, everything takes time to adapt. Companies that offer good results in unstable environments are those that do not make the mistake of thinking that a market is large or is not ripe when it is neither. Are those that do not make bets impossible or create unfounded assumptions.
- Companies with meteoric growth are enormous predisposition to the equally meteoric fall, and therefore a thing as another cause tremendous trauma.
We are in the Age 2.0, it is true, businesses also evolve towards that 2.0, right. But that does not mean that everything becomes smoke, or that production systems are no longer necessary, nor that the primary and secondary sectors are obsolete and unserviceable and that the future is only in the tertiary, in services, and yet beyond that, in content, in pure knowledge, in the virtual ether. No.

Behind every business and every expectation there must be a reality. If you offer a product must be able to manufacture it, serve, maintain and restore. If you offer a service must offer guarantees, attention and problem solving. If you have a business, must respond to what your business offers. The promises on promises remain virtual smoke, or anything. The “anything” does not generate wealth, not fueling the economy, we can not pay the mortgage and it is not sufficient to pay the purchase in the supermarket.
And, finally, of course, all this is just a matter of money. The money, which is much more so than the Virtual Business 2.0 and 3.0 the crisis. Money is a concept, a metaphor, an illusion that we have enshrined in paper and plastic cards to make us look real. But it is not.
We could dwell on this item to fall from exhaustion. No lo vamos a hacer. We are not going to do. Just finally, a simple thought: if all is smoke, if all of we sell smoke, we will have to make a very big bonfire to generate much smoke, and end up burning.
This is a very interesting and informative video lasts about 10 minutes. In fact is an excerpt from the original (which lasts 47 minutes) “The money as debt” and weinvite you to see if you have a little more time, it is worth.
Add comment October 27, 2008
Web 2.0 already has its soundtrack
Web 2.0, with everything that has been written and write about it, had to have their song. We’ve searched the Internet what you sing this Web participatory demodrática and full of tools, networks, platforms and directories. And we have found quite a few things, as expected, but between those things there are a number of “hits”. It seems that blogs, twitter and facebook are the phenomena that over 2.0 inspire artists. Listen…
Are you blogging this???…
Twitter whore…
Facebook Song – Bristol Chapter…
And now that Web 2.0 is also sing, perhaps it is time to recognize that, beyond the impact on the communication, business and relationships, is not that we are starting to love it …. What is your favorite? Sing and enjoy
Add comment October 24, 2008









